真题研读
← 词汇
大纲词考频

privacy中等

考点词n. (不受干扰的)独处,自由,隐私;私生活
30真题出现次数
10套试卷
3次落在考点上

义项分布 · 点义项筛选原句

  • n. 私生活未考
真题原句共 30 句

n. (不受干扰的)独处,自由,隐私30 次

  • With AI’s potential to simplify our professional lives, do the admin and enhance the work experience, it’s up to us to navigate its usage cautiously so it supports us without compromising our privacy.

    人工智能有潜力简化我们的职业生活、处理行政事务并改善工作体验,因此我们有责任审慎地驾驭它的使用,使它在支持我们的同时不损害我们的隐私。

  • But it’s also a lot more personal, Ortiz says, arguing that because art is so closely linked to a person, it could raise data protection and privacy problems.

    但奥尔蒂斯说,这还涉及更多个人层面的问题。她认为,由于艺术与个人联系如此紧密,这可能引发数据保护和隐私问题。

  • Privacy issues in the application of AI.

    人工智能应用中的隐私问题。

  • Existing health privacy law, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, is primarily focused on the way hospitals, doctors’ offices, clinics and insurance companies store health records online.

    现有的健康隐私法,如《健康保险流通与责任法案》,主要关注医院、医生诊所、诊所和保险公司在网上存储健康记录的方式。

  • The FTC alleged in a complaint that “despite express privacy claims, the company took control of users’ sensitive fertility data and shared it with third parties.”

    联邦贸易委员会在一份诉状中指控称,“尽管该公司明确作出了隐私承诺,但它控制了用户敏感的生育数据,并与第三方共享。”

  • Section 5 of the FTC Act empowers the FTC to initiate enforcement action against unfair or deceptive acts, meaning the FTC can only act after the fact if a company’s privacy practices are misleading or cause unjustified consumer harm.

    《联邦贸易委员会法》第5条授权联邦贸易委员会对不公平或欺骗性行为采取执法行动,这意味着只有当一家公司的隐私做法具有误导性或对消费者造成不当损害时,联邦贸易委员会才能事后采取行动。

展开其余 24 条
  • As to the prospects for federal legislation, commentators suggest that comprehensive federal privacy legislation seems unlikely in the short term.

    至于联邦立法的前景,评论人士认为,短期内似乎不太可能出台全面的联邦隐私立法。

  • California has been at the forefront of state privacy efforts with the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018.

    加利福尼亚州凭借2018年的《加州消费者隐私法》走在了各州隐私保护工作的前列。

  • California has been at the forefront of state privacy efforts with the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018.

    加利福尼亚州凭借2018年的《加州消费者隐私法》走在了各州隐私保护工作的前列。

  • Virginia, Colorado and Utah have also recently passed state consumer data privacy legislation.

    弗吉尼亚州、科罗拉多州和犹他州最近也通过了州一级的消费者数据隐私立法。

  • What does the author imply about existing health privacy law?

    关于现有的健康隐私法,作者暗示了什么?

  • Businesses should engage in conversations with IT, compliance, risk, and legal teams to review their privacy policy, and include in the discussion the customer/user experience designers and coders responsible for the company’s user interface, as well as the marketers and advertisers responsible for sign-ups, checkout baskets, pricing, and promotions.

    企业应与信息技术、合规、风险和法律团队展开对话,审查其隐私政策,并让负责公司用户界面的客户/用户体验设计师和程序员,以及负责注册、购物车结算、定价和促销的营销人员和广告人员也参与讨论。

  • In March, the California Attorney General announced the approval of additional regulations under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) that “ensure that consumers will not be confused or misled when seeking to exercise their data privacy rights.”

    今年3月,加州总检察长宣布批准了《加州消费者隐私法案》(CCPA)下的附加法规,以“确保消费者在寻求行使其数据隐私权时不会被混淆或误导”。

  • In March, the California Attorney General announced the approval of additional regulations under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) that “ensure that consumers will not be confused or misled when seeking to exercise their data privacy rights.”

    今年3月,加州总检察长宣布批准了《加州消费者隐私法案》(CCPA)下的附加法规,以“确保消费者在寻求行使其数据隐私权时不会被混淆或误导”。

  • grant companies data privacy rights.

    授予公司数据隐私权

  • It is against that background that the information commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, has issued her damning verdict against the Royal Free hospital trust under the NHS, which handed over to DeepMind the records of 1.6 million patients in 2015 on the basis of a vague agreement which took far too little account of the patients’ rights and their expectations of privacy.

    正是在这样的背景下,信息专员伊丽莎白·德纳姆对NHS下属的皇家自由医院信托作出了措辞严厉的裁决。该信托在2015年依据一份含糊的协议将160万名患者的记录交给了DeepMind,而这份协议对患者的权利及其对隐私的期望考虑得太少了。

  • But privacy is not the only angle in this case and not even the most important.

    但隐私并不是此案唯一的角度,甚至不是最重要的角度。

  • Privacy law builds on the concept of damage to an individual from identifiable knowledge about them.

    隐私法建立在这样一个概念之上:可识别的个人信息会对个人造成损害。

  • The use of privacy law to curb the tech giants in this instance feels slightly maladapted.

    在这一事例中用隐私法来约束科技巨头,感觉有点不太合适。

  • privacy protection must be secured at all costs.

    必须不惜一切代价确保隐私保护。

  • the ineffective enforcement of privacy law.

    隐私法执行不力。

  • emphasize the importance of privacy protection.

    强调隐私保护的重要性。

  • Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy.

    美国人应该采取措施保护自己的数字隐私。

  • citizens’ privacy is not effectively protected.

    公民的隐私没有得到有效保护。

  • Brendon Lynch, Microsoft’s chief privacy officer, blogged: “We believe consumers should have more control.”

    微软首席隐私官布伦登·林奇在博客中写道:“我们认为消费者应该拥有更多的控制权。”

  • Fourth, electronic means of payment may [raise] security and privacy concerns.

    第四,电子支付手段可能引发人们对安全和隐私的担忧。

  • There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

    人们担心政府、雇主和营销人员可能获取这些数据,从而侵犯我们的隐私。

  • The Internet affords anonymity to its users, a blessing to privacy and freedom of speech.

    互联网为用户提供了匿名性,这对隐私和言论自由来说是一件幸事。

  • Can privacy be preserved [while] bringing safety and security to a world that seems increasingly [lawless]?

    在给一个似乎日益无法无天的世界带来安全保障的同时,隐私能否得到保护?

  • Still, the administration's plan has [divided] privacy rights activists.

    不过,政府的这项计划在隐私权倡导者中引起了分歧。